[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:27:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> If a volunteer is willing to give us code to support using lldb, does it then
>> become a question of which uses to _not facilitate_? That's really what I
>> reacting to. I totally understand not *making an effort* to support something
>> that might inhibit the growth of gdb; but if we're in the position of
>> receiving code to support lldb, then should the same argument be used to deny
>> its acceptance. Or is this not what you're saying?
> Such code to support LLDB exists.
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/editors/emacs/files/extrapatch-lldb-gud.el?view=log
>
> It's available now for Emacs users on at least one (free) operating system.
This is the patch that was retracted from the LLVM repository because of
copyright issues, IIRC.
So, it's clearly not an option for inclusion into Emacs.
Stefan
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/14
- Re: lldb support, Joseph Mingrone, 2016/11/15
- Re: lldb support,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: lldb support, Sam Steingold, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10