[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:00:47 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) |
>>>>> "GM" == Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
GM> I suggest looking at the date the issue was closed and comparing it to the
GM> date the version numbering was changed. But then you also need to check
GM> for issues that have been backported since. And you might also want to
GM> review every such issue to see if it _should_ be backported now.
Btw, it's exactly this sort of confusion that I wanted to avoid by using a
3-branch scheme (current release target, next minor, next major).
The 2-branch scheme we have now makes this sort of confusion a regular part of
ongoing development, because we'll always encounter the case where a fix on
'master' ends up becoming part of the next release, ahead of whichever version
master was marked as at the time the bug was fixed.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Glenn Morris, 2016/11/08
- Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, John Wiegley, 2016/11/08
- Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/08
- Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Glenn Morris, 2016/11/13
- Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/11/14
- Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/14
- RE: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Herring, Davis, 2016/11/15
- Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/15
Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2, Tino Calancha, 2016/11/16