[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:33:23 +0200 |
> From: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:49:02 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> The key insight there is that we shouldn't have redisplay *lock* the display
> matrix and render it. The lisp universe should send a *copy* of the matrix
> set, then go about its business. This way, redisplay can go display that copy
> and everything is decoupled. You turn the system into an Erlang like message
> passing environment.
The glyph matrices are not exposed to Lisp, so there's no issue here
to begin with.
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/28
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/30
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/30
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/30
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/30
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/30
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/10/30
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/31
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/31