Re: Concurrency, again

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:47:21 +0200 Michael Albinus <address@hidden> wrote: 

MA> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
>> A few from my experience:
>> 
>> - Tramp to a slow system

MA> The point of Tramp is not to use additional power of sleeping cores, but
MA> waiting for slow connections. One could already make some of its
MA> handlers asynchronously as of today

You are right that in this use case (unlike some others I gave),
a non-blocking API is all that's needed.

I'm also not sure if Tramp would be asynchronous when a Tramp method
used just core functions, no process.

Ted