[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2016 21:17:38 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "RMS" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
RMS> The reason namespaces systems do not fit well into Lisp
RMS> is that they have to operate in 'read', in the choice of which
RMS> symbol object you get.
That's pretty much what my module implementation does: it renames
symbols while reading.
https://github.com/tromey/emacs-module
This means the source code uses short names, but the result respects the
Emacs naming conventions.
Tom
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nicolas Petton, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11