Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: address@hidden (Phillip Lord)
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,  <address@hidden>,  <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:32:34 +0100
> 
> > But I do not really understand when exactly we have to distinguish
> > between the two formats.  Isn't it more like a one way extraction of
> > ELPA package into core and then the job is done and distinction doesn't
> > really matter anymore?
> 
> Not if we are using package.el to make the packages available. It is
> package.el which sets the load path, loads the autoloads file, that sort
> of thing.

If it's package.el dictating this, then let's change it or extend it
to support what we need.