[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'.
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'. |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:17:30 -0400 |
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Karl Fogel <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I can't (re)close the bug, because it was closed earlier as "wontfix" and it
> now says "Bug is archived. No further changes may be made."
It looks like the "wontfix" tag wasn't actually applied. You can send
a message to <address@hidden> with contents
unarchive 286
tag 286 fixed
quit
To mark it as "fixed". See https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html
for more options/details.
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/02
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'.,
Noam Postavsky <=
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/03
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/03
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Davis Herring, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/04