Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> > Can't we handle the differences during the build without separating
>> > directories?  E.g., we already have some files that should not be
>> > byte-compiled, and we handle it with a file-local variable.  Can't we
>> > do something similar with this issue?
>> 
>> Sure. We already, for example, have the obsolete directory which is
>> excluded from some of the build make processes.
>> 
>> But, I think it will ultimately be more complex. We will have one
>> subdirectory with a different package organisation from the all the
>> others.

EZ> We should at least try, IMO, and not dismiss that possibility before we
EZ> really see the difficulties and can assess them.

I agree with Eli here. The more "natural" we can make the ELPA integration,
the better I think it will be, since it will allow the flexibility for either
approach, depending on what is best.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2