Re: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line

[Tino Calancha]

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Tino Calancha wrote:

> I have prepared to patches `D' and `W': the former follows DWIM, the later
> follows your suggestion.
>
> `D':
> * 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> `W':
> * 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> I don't have any preference for one or the other.  Both provide the same
> behaviour, so i am fine to push the one that people here prefer.

This thread became very general and interesting.  I would like to
ask one particular question:
i provided 2 patches, `W' and `D'.  The first, `W', address John
complaint, while `D' follows the original proposal.
As i said, i have no preference between, i just want to provide
the missing functionality.  Both patches provide the same.
The question is, what patch should apply?
Thanks.