Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Stefan Monnier]

> Sure, that's true. My point was, thought, that MELPA as it stands would
> support the workflow of ELPA. The only difference, really, is that MELPA
> requires tags to identify stable releases, which seems not a bad thing.
> How this would work with lots of packages in one repo, though, I do not
> know.

Of course, one issue with one-repo-per-package is that in order to find
out which packages to (re)build, we either need to constantly poll all
the repositories, or we need some side-band signal.

Git is pretty good at updating all the branches of a single repository,
in comparison.


        Stefan