[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining]
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining] |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:50:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> > I was under the impression that Eli's concern was with the effect of
>> > the b-c-f change itself, not with bugs that might be introduced by
>> > the change.
>> I can't speak for Eli, but at least that's not my worry.
> I actually don't understand the difference: how is "the effect of the
> change itself" different from "bugs that might be introduced" by it.
> Sounds like the latter is a subset of the former?
The request is to change the way b-c-f and a-c-f are run such that
they're always exactly paired. Any patch which implements such a change
could have any number of other impacts. So we can divide the impacts of such
a patch into 2 parts:
- the part which changes b-c-f and a-c-f to be exactly paired.
- the rest.
I think the first part should be 100% safe, because any code which works
correctly with the current looser behavior of b/a-c-f should also work
correctly with the tighter behavior. Of course, there might be code out
there which relies on the details of the current behavior b/a-c-f, but
I'm not worried about that at all.
"The rest" is the more likely source of worry.
Stefan
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], (continued)
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/11
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Daniel Colascione, 2016/08/28
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/28
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Daniel Colascione, 2016/08/28
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/28
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Daniel Colascione, 2016/08/28
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/28
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Daniel Colascione, 2016/08/28
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/29
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/29
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining],
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/29
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Daniel Colascione, 2016/08/29
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/29
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Phillip Lord, 2016/08/30
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/30
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Daniel Colascione, 2016/08/30
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/30
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/29
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Daniel Colascione, 2016/08/29
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/29