[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: M-x shell question
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: M-x shell question |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2016 01:29:41 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Following the convention of keeping the package name as the first part of
> the command name, may be the command should be named 'shell-cd'?
That name is logical, but inconvenient: you have to type s h e SPC SPC c d.
'shell-this-directory' is almost as inconvenient: s h e SPC SPC t.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- M-x shell question, Richard Stallman, 2016/08/17
- Re: M-x shell question, raman, 2016/08/17
- Re: M-x shell question, Uwe Brauer, 2016/08/17
- Re: M-x shell question, Richard Stallman, 2016/08/18
- Fwd: M-x shell question, Kaushal Modi, 2016/08/18
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Kaushal Modi, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Robert Weiner, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Kaushal Modi, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Robert Weiner, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Kaushal Modi, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/19
- Re: M-x shell question, Oleh Krehel, 2016/08/18
- Re: M-x shell question, Andreas Schwab, 2016/08/18
- Re: M-x shell question, Tino Calancha, 2016/08/18