Re: About the 'minibuffer' frame parameter

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:15:45 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
> 
>  >> This goes both ways.  With (2) Emacs would choose nil when
>  >> ‘set-frame-position’ explicitly asks for a window.  And with no
>  >> 'minibuffer' specified we'd have to return t or a window in any case.
>  >
>  > Yes, but IMO nil is not a meaningful value.  If we know better, we
>  > should return a more concrete value.
> 
> Sounds convincing.
> 
>  > Yes, of course, the current situation is not impossible.  We are
>  > talking about improving it.
> 
> I attached a preliminary version of the code changes.  Please have a
> look.

I took a cursory look, and it looks OK to me.

Thanks.