[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:56:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> If it is indeed the case, then a solution to the problem would be to
> check that before- and after-c-f are called alternately. Any time
> after-c-f is called twice in a row, we could reverse the change just made
> (using the undo list), invoke before-c-f, redo the change, then let
> after-c-f continue to completion. If necessary, we can temporarily
Sounds like piling up workarounds to make up for a mistake in the
underlying design.
Stefan
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], (continued)
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/18
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/19
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/19
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/19
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/19
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining], Stefan Monnier, 2016/08/19
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/07
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/08
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/08
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/09
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Phillip Lord, 2016/08/19
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/30