[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allow for result arg in seq-doseq ?
|
From: |
Tino Calancha |
|
Subject: |
Re: Allow for result arg in seq-doseq ? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 21:07:03 +0900 (JST) |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) |
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Nicolas Petton wrote:
IIRC the first version was like that, but for a forgotten reason, Stefan
(in the Cc) thought that the RESULT arg was useless (I myself never use
it in `dolist').
I am not opposed to adding it back though.
Hi Nico,
To be honest i don't use RESULT on dolist either :-)
My weak motivation to add this is just that i 'dolist'
and 'seq-doseq' would be more similar.
Anyway, even allowing RESULT in 'seq-doseq' they will differ on the
return value when RESULT is missing:
* dolist return nil
* seq-doseq return sequence.
Regards,
Tino