[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:44:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.95 (darwin) |
>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> They have different purposes: (1) is to make tls.el, which uses command-line
> tunnels, more noisy by default, so users are led to the C bindings to GnuTLS
> (gnutls.el). (2) is to disable SSLv3 in tls.el. (3) is to change the
> variables in gnutls.el a bit to make customization and future work easier.
> (3) is the only risky one because it affects user customizations, but I
> think we have to bite that buller sooner or later.
OK. Does anyone else have a reason to object to these changes?
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/05
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, John Wiegley, 2016/07/05
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Robert Pluim, 2016/07/07
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/12
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, John Wiegley, 2016/07/12
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/13
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/13
Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/07/20