Re: 2 release blocking bugs left for 25.1!

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>>> I'd like to suggest 23785 as a blocker also -- the bug (in the report) is
>>>> not too serious, but as a fix may involve a change in the command loop,
>>>> I'd rather do this before a RC.
>>> If the bug is not too serious, can you explain the rationale for making it
>>> a blocker?
>> The symptoms are not too serious, but it's a bug in the undo system, so may
>> have significant implications elsewhere.

> And it's a regression in 25.1 due to the new undo code.

This does sounds like a blocker, then. What are the repercussions for fixing
the issue? Will it need a full round of pretesting to become ready for the
release candidate?

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2