Re: Asynchronous DNS

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:

> I do appreciate the contribution, and think asynchronous DNS is a valuable
> addition, but it hasn't passed the litmus test yet for merging toward the next
> release. If agreement can be reached before the next freeze, that's great;
> otherwise, it will have to wait until later.

Well, it's not for the next release, it's for the one after that...
(Unless by "next" you don't mean "the first".  :-))

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no