[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows t
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows to do something." |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:35:55 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> This does, however, also return several false positives, most of them
> with "require" (one is written as `require' and one or two of the others
> should probably be quoted like that).
I don't know for certain what you found, but "require to do" has the
same English usage rules as "permit to do" or "allow to do": the
entity that will do it must be stated.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows to do something.", Alan Mackenzie, 2016/01/24
- Re: To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows to do something.", Marcin Borkowski, 2016/01/24
- Re: To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows to do something.", Stephen Berman, 2016/01/24
- RE: To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows to do something.", Drew Adams, 2016/01/24
- Re: To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows to do something.", Rostislav Svoboda, 2016/01/25
- Re: To non-native English writers: expunging the solecism "This allows to do something.", Richard Stallman, 2016/01/25