Re: Next release from master

[Stefan Monnier]

> It's still an open question whether we should be using emacs-X+master, or
> master+next, though. Our current activity is something of an experiment in
> that regard, since in my experience (having gotten used to "next" branches), I
> was unfamiliar with a 'master' that is periodically frozen with respect to
> feature work.

FWIW, here are the two main constraints we want to try and satisfy:
- coders should know where to install bug-fixes and new features.
- users should know where to get the current "stable bleeding-edge".
- "should know" means that it doesn't depend on whether we're in
  feature-freeze, in pretest, or anything else.
Currently, we don't satisfy those constraints, and Barry's suggestion
would seem to help in this regard.


        Stefan