[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc. |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:40:11 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 07:49:44 -0800
>
> > This is not a summary, this is propaganda. If you cannot summarize an
> > issue objectively, please don't summarize at all. I deliberately
> > avoided replying for fear of being too involved to write an objective
> > summary. I wish you exercised the same self-restraint.
> >
> > John, please disregard this "summary".
>
> Nice trick, shutting down discussion so that the code stays by default.
I didn't shut down any discussion. You are free to continue writing,
on this subject as on any other.
> I see nothing wrong with advocacy.
Neither do I. Just don't submit advocacy as a "summary" when a
decision-maker requests one in order to make up his/her mind.
Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03