[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Mac port
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Mac port |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:21:00 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> writes:
> I'd rather like to avoid having/maintaining multiple versions of the Mac
> port, because that doesn't look better than the present situation. Currently
> I feel inclined to keep it separated from the standard distribution.
Unless I misunderstand, right now you are maintaining a patch. If we merge
most of your work (though apparently not all), doesn't this just meant that
the size of the patch you maintain becomes much smaller? I'd think that no
matter what, this is a win for any fork maintainer.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Ingo Lohmar, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Bozhidar Batsov, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/02
- Re: Emacs Mac port,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Bozhidar Batsov, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/04
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Chad Brown, 2016/01/04
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/04
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Alan Schmitt, 2016/01/06
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Martin Yrjölä, 2016/01/05
- Re: Emacs Mac port, João Távora, 2016/01/05