[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lisp watchpoints
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: Lisp watchpoints |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2015 09:12:34 -0500 |
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Isn't the FUNCTIONP test needed for basically the same reason as using
>> CONSP over !NILP? i.e. to avoid segfault in case of (put <var>
>> 'watchers '([1])).
>
> Ffuncall does all necessary checks.
It would signal in case of error right? Currently the code is ignoring
bad watcher elements (including out of range integers), but perhaps
it's actually better to signal an error.
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, (continued)
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/16
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/22
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/22
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/28
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/28
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints,
Noam Postavsky <=
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/30
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29