Re: Suggest: dont declare interactive-p obsolete

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> > This is a minor change -- that will let existing code run without warnings.
>> > If we turned the defun in subr.el to a defsubst and dropped the (declare
>> > (obsolete called-interactively-p "23.2")) (called-interactively-p
>> > 'interactive))
>> 
>> I don't see any downsides to this; others?

> Because we want to cause Lisp programs not to use it?

> There's only a handful of users of this in Emacs -- why not simply rewrite
> them to use called-interactively-p? If we deprecated it, we should be the
> first to remove it, no?

> I really don't see any reasons to revert our decision because of few places
> that need to be cleaned up.

OK, let's clean up those places then.

John