[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IDE
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:00:34 -0700 (PDT) |
> > For references, you are supposed to use ID-Utils or something similar,
> > which use a different format of their DB.
>
> Two different tools, for more or less identical jobs except that one is
> one->many and the other is many->one? (In particular, the hard part
> isn't the data structure, but the parsing.)
What prevents someone from creating a TAGS file that includes
"references" as (additions forms of) "definitions"? How is
adding references different in principle from adding, say,
handling of defstructs to a program that previously only
handled defuns and defvars?
You can index pretty much anything. You could presumably
even create a full-text index and write it out as a TAGS
file, if you were up to it.
(But I agree: the hard part is the parsing. The TAGS file
data structure is not the problem.)
- Re: Is EDE only intended to be used with languages which /require/ a 'compile' step? [was: Re: IDE], (continued)
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/15
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Tom, 2015/10/12
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/25
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24