[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 14:40:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Lots of subtle details of how Emacs commands behave in various situations
> are convenient for some users. Users have chosen their usage based on those
> details. A simple and clean scheme to make things uniform can be very
> elegant, and yet make many users unhappy.
I do agree with this. Any uniform core must allow for the idiosyncratic
behaviors people have come to rely upon. If we find this cannot be done,
I'd give up on the attempt.
What I want to explore is whether things can be better. We have great
unification in some areas, and I've a sense there are more opportunities
if we can build the right layers of abstraction.
John
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Oleh Krehel, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/12
- Message not available
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/12
- Message not available
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, martin rudalics, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10