|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin |
Date: | Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:06:14 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 |
On 10/01/2015 10:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
v and c are neighbors, so I don't see why "C-x v c" would be hard.
It's not hard, it's harder. Again, if `vc-commit' is going to be the preferred command, it should use the better binding.
Arguing otherwise is discouraging, and it's a good example of why focus on backward compatibility saps mental energy. Would you prefer I don't work on this change at all?
I ask once again why not make vc-next-action support some simple workflow with modern VCSes.
That's very vague.
To my (obviously) limited knowledge, RMS is the only user of a locking backend, and so far he hasn't answered the pertinent question about his workflow.If by "locking VCS" you mean RCS, then I use it from time to time.
Could you answer that question, then?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |