[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: need for 'dynamical-let'?
|
From: |
Dmitri Paduchikh |
|
Subject: |
Re: need for 'dynamical-let'? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jul 2015 05:02:48 +0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> It seems that the situation with advices even worse than with macros. As
>> I understand it, the code of advice may be compiled at runtime but it is
>> unknown in what context compilation will be done.
SM> That's true for old-style `defadvice', but not for new-style
SM> `advice-add'.
Understood. Is it planned to obsolete `defadvice'?
- Re: need for 'dynamical-let'?, (continued)
Re: need for 'dynamical-let'?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/24