[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string> missing?
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
Re: string> missing? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:37:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nick Andryshak <address@hidden> writes:
>> Because they do. The cause is lost in history.
>
>> No, I don't agree.
>
>> That's exactly the point: there's no need to apply the same logic to
>> both cases.
>
> Those are entirely unreasonable answers.
In what way is any one of the answers the least bit unreasonable?
- Re: string> missing?, (continued)
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Andreas Schwab, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?,
Jay Belanger <=
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Jay Belanger, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Thibaut Verron, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Thibaut Verron, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Thibaut Verron, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03