|
| From: | Dmitry Gutov |
| Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 9d35bb8: Fix minor quoting problems in doc strings |
| Date: | Wed, 20 May 2015 01:30:07 +0300 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 |
On 05/20/2015 01:01 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
-with a space, for which the regexp is `\\` '. See the source file for +with a space, for which the regexp is ‘\\` ’. See the source file for -with a #, for which the regexp is `\\`#'. See the source file for +with a #, for which the regexp is ‘\\`#’. See the source file for -Match addresses of the style ``name%[stuff].'' when called with DELIM -of \"%\" and addresses of the style address@hidden'' when +Match addresses of the style “name%[stuff].” when called with DELIM +of \"%\" and addresses of the style address@hidden when -Used for file name completion. Must not contain `'', `,' and `\"' +Used for file name completion. Must not contain ‘'’, ‘,’ and ‘\"’
FWIW, these bits don't look quoting-method-agnostic to me.
- "Whether to show ``[N]'' for the Nth item up to 10. + "Whether to show “[N]” for the Nth item up to 10.
The curly double quotes raise additional questions: would they be used everywhere instead of the escaped straight double-quotes (present in other places in your patch)? Do they have any special meaning, like the single quotes?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |