[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UI inconveniences with M-.
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: UI inconveniences with M-. |
Date: |
Sat, 2 May 2015 21:29:40 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 |
On 05/02/2015 10:59 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:
Theoretically this can already be done by ignoring xref-location-group
or by specializing xref-location-group for xref-etags-location so that it
returns always the same group.
Or, if we try to be extra-informative, group by find-tag-tag-order
functions (maybe replacing each name with some words in human language;
or classify them into several groups, too). But we won't have any place
to write file names to.
Thinking about it: for etags it would make sense to group xrefs by name
of the TAGS file because etags--xref-find-definitions doesn't sort xrefs
"globally"; xrefs are reordered only within a TAGS file.
Indeed. But when combined with the above, it will be 2-3 levels of grouping.
- Re: UI inconveniences with M-., (continued)
Re: UI inconveniences with M-., Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/02
Re: UI inconveniences with M-.,
Dmitry Gutov <=
xref "find references" and grouping, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/02
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Helmut Eller, 2015/05/02
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/02
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Helmut Eller, 2015/05/03
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/03
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/03
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/05/04
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/05/04
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/04
- Re: xref "find references" and grouping, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/05/04