[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:30:02 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> > What is the difference with:
> > - (load custom-file) + (load user-init-file)
> > - loading init file with (load custom-file) on top of it.
>
> The first case will crash-and-burn if some of the settings in
> custom-file only work after some of the code in the user's
> user-init-file.
XEmacs did this for years (when XEmacs was very popular), and there
were no such problems. I suppose settings in custom-file rarely
depend on init settings in "crash and burn" way. The real issue is
supporting the occasional user who wants fine control over the
custom-loading process. See my reply to Thierry for a use case.
- RE: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, (continued)
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/04/29
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, raman, 2015/04/28
- RE: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Drew Adams, 2015/04/27
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/04/27
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/27
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/27
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/04/29
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/29
- Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/27