Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Nicolas Richard <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:50:02 +0200
> 
> Oleh Krehel <address@hidden> writes:
> > It's not obvious how simple or intricate INTERNAL_FIELD is or what it
> > does. At the first glance, looks like C++ member function call.
> 
> >From the perspective of someone who never touches C source, I think
> INTERNAL_FIELD spelled out is more clear on the intent than an
> underscore.

I agree.  But if this underscore always hides inside the likes of BVAR
and KVAR, and is never explicitly seen anywhere else, then we don't
really need INTERNAL_FIELD, do we?