Re: Bug in Elisp font-locking

[Tassilo Horn]

Johan Bockgård <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Johan,

>> I've committed the patch for elisp, and just now also for CL after
>> scratching my head why its regex explicitly handled "(setf <symbol>" as
>> function name.
>
> It *is* a function name, and you can use it like this: #'(setf foo)

Interesting.

>> Aha, that's a setf-expander.
>
> Actually a "setf function", not a "setf expander".

Ah, yes.  Searching the net, I found out these setf functions are an
alternative to setf expanders for simpler cases.  Neat.  But we don't
have them in Elisp, not even in cl-defun, right?

Bye,
Tassilo