[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Switching from old git tree
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Switching from old git tree |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:55:07 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:18:19 +0100
>
> On the same file system, the normal git clone operation uses hard
> links, and those are unproblematic regarding the given caveat.
Of course they are unproblematic: hard links are the default if -s is
_not_ used. I was talking only about the suggestion to use -s.
- Re: Switching from old git tree, (continued)
- Re: Switching from old git tree, Sven Axelsson, 2014/11/14
- Re: Switching from old git tree, Peder O. Klingenberg, 2014/11/14
- Re: Switching from old git tree, David Kastrup, 2014/11/14
- Re: Switching from old git tree, Sven Axelsson, 2014/11/14
- Re: Switching from old git tree, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/14
- Re: Switching from old git tree, David Caldwell, 2014/11/14
- Re: Switching from old git tree, David Kastrup, 2014/11/14
- Re: Switching from old git tree, Kenneth Raeburn, 2014/11/15
- Re: Switching from old git tree, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/15
- Re: Switching from old git tree, David Kastrup, 2014/11/15
- Re: Switching from old git tree,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Switching from old git tree, Ken Raeburn, 2014/11/15
Re: Switching from old git tree, Nicolas Richard, 2014/11/14