[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:28:52 -0400 |
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:32:30 +0100 RĂ¼diger Sonderfeld
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Glib already seems to use several hacks to work around the
> limitations of kqueue
As a aside: people keep mentioning that they believe kqueue has some
sort of fundamental limitations. I'm curious what those are perceived
to be. So far as I can tell, the interface is fine -- it is a rough
equivalent to what you can do in Linux with epoll (which is currently
preferred over select and its successors).
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, (continued)
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Michael Albinus, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Michael Albinus, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Perry E. Metzger, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Dima Kogan, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Perry E. Metzger, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2014/10/29
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, RĂ¼diger Sonderfeld, 2014/10/31
- Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate,
Perry E. Metzger <=
Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/26
Re: gfile-based file notifications are not immediate, Michael Albinus, 2014/10/26