[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:07:50 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:45:54 +0400
> From: Dmitry Antipov <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Why not just use ICU?
Emacs needs to be able to extend the Unicode code-point space for raw
8-bit bytes and for a couple of character sets that are not unified.
Can ICU support that? If not, we cannot base our implementation on
ICU without a lot of redesign.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, James Cloos, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Sam Steingold, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Sam Steingold, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Johan Bockgård, 2014/09/22
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Robin Templeton, 2014/09/26
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/26
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/26
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/26
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/27