[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile emacs thread (again)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Guile emacs thread (again) |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:20:16 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
It will not mean that Elisp programs will need to be rewritten in
Scheme, or even that Emacs will necessarily support extensions written
in Scheme
Supporting Emacs extensions written in Scheme is part of the goal I
had in mind when I proposed this. That's the tangible benefit that we
would get from Scheme support. If all Scheme does is serve as a platform
for Emacs Lisp, it is no real advance.
It is ok if it is necessary to write these extensions in a slightly
unusual style to get them to interoperate properly with Emacs Lisp
programs. For instance, maybe it would require using special
functions to test for Elisp nil.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Robin Templeton, 2014/09/20
Re: Guile emacs thread (again), LluĂs, 2014/09/17
Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Robin Templeton, 2014/09/18
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Christopher Allan Webber, 2014/09/18
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/20
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Richard Stallman, 2014/09/21
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/21
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/21
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/21
Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer, 2014/09/16