[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why malformed let-form is silently accepted?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Why malformed let-form is silently accepted? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:47:52 +0900 |
Dmitry Antipov writes:
> (let 1) ==> eval: Wrong type argument: sequencep, 1
> (let [1 2 3 4]) ==> nil ???
Not in XEmacs, which tests for listp, not sequencep.
I guess Stefan is trying to evolve Elisp into Clojure, or maybe
Python.
Shouldn't-that-test-be-monadp-ly y'rs,
.