emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why malformed let-form is silently accepted?


From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Why malformed let-form is silently accepted?
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:47:52 +0900

Dmitry Antipov writes:

 > (let 1) ==> eval: Wrong type argument: sequencep, 1
 > (let [1 2 3 4]) ==> nil ???

Not in XEmacs, which tests for listp, not sequencep.

I guess Stefan is trying to evolve Elisp into Clojure, or maybe
Python.

Shouldn't-that-test-be-monadp-ly y'rs,

.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]