[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history
From: |
Eric Hanchrow |
Subject: |
Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:37:52 -0700 |
What Paul said. Eric's own rule of thumb was that the result of the
conversion should look as if git had been in use the entire time; that
would imply that the "name at the time of contribution" would have
been recorded.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>
>> what do we consider most useful in the event of
>> a personal name change: name at time of contribution or most
>> recent name?
>
>
> Name at time of contribution, though it's not a big deal.
>
- Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Paul Eggert, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, David Kastrup, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history,
Eric Hanchrow <=
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, David Kastrup, 2014/03/31