Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history

[Eric Hanchrow]

What Paul said.  Eric's own rule of thumb was that the result of the
conversion should look as if git had been in use the entire time; that
would imply that the "name at the time of contribution" would have
been recorded.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>
>> what do we consider most useful in the event of
>> a personal name change: name at time of contribution or most
>> recent name?
>
>
> Name at time of contribution, though it's not a big deal.
>