[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About CEDET, Completion, and compilers
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: About CEDET, Completion, and compilers |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:40:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Am 13.03.2014 04:04, schrieb Eric M. Ludlam:
[ ... ]
Hi Eric,
yes, CEDET is a very interesting tool.
BTW just reading at SO an answer WRT to IDE's, which IMO also stresses the
usefulness of further CEDET-development:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22372526/integrated-development-environments/22372626#22372626
There was a remark in the thread saying something like:
CEDET provides a toolset, but no-one uses it - beside CEDET itself.
Maybe it's an occasion to make that point up:
As for me, the maybe silly reason is EIEIO. Never understood what it's good for
- and didn't want to learn something not understood...
WRT what's reported from other OO-tools, was not surprised to experience
slowness.
The problem with OO-programming seems some hardly predictable multiplying of
procedures.
In addition EIEIO is written in Emacs Lisp, which isn't known to be very fast
itself.
So at some point got the idea CEDET will never be reliably fast...
Sorry for that.
Given that's true - what about dropping EIEIO and re-building everything in
plain Emacs Lisp?
Cheers,
Andreas
- About CEDET, Completion, and compilers, Eric M. Ludlam, 2014/03/12
- Re: About CEDET, Completion, and compilers,
Andreas Röhler <=
- Re: About CEDET, Completion, and compilers, João Távora, 2014/03/13
- Re: About CEDET, Completion, and compilers, Eric M. Ludlam, 2014/03/13
- EIEIO, Daniel Colascione, 2014/03/13
- Re: EIEIO, Eric M. Ludlam, 2014/03/13
- Re: EIEIO, David Engster, 2014/03/14
- Re: EIEIO, Eric Abrahamsen, 2014/03/14
- Re: EIEIO, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/14
- Re: EIEIO, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/03/15
- ELPA Go integration Was: EIEIO, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/15