[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:01:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The dead branches complicate this process a *lot*, esoecially the part
> where I back up through the history looking for a ChangeLog entry marking
> the actual deletion point. I just figured out that the reason I've only
> found two real deletion points in sixteen tries is because the dead
> branches are getting in the way.
I don't understand why those branches make any difference, unless you're
trying to do your analysis also on those branches, which is
not worthwhile. Just preserve their info "as-is". The only important
part is that if someone wants to look at them he doesn't need to go back
to Bzr.
Stefan