[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git
From: |
grischka |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:08:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
I do wonder if new contributers to projects are ever discouraged by
the difficulty of learning git - it must be an order of magnitude
more difficult to learn to use effectively than CVS or Mercurial.
FWIW, at http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git we allow pushes for
everybody without registration, and while we had quite some
such contributions we didn't see a single git question on the
mailing list nor any mess in the repo over the years ever.
Beyond that these people almost never seem to write bad patches,
and eventually are lazy to explain what they are doing. Maybe
by incident, maybe not.
--- grischka
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, (continued)
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Rostislav Svoboda, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jay Belanger, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/06
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jay Belanger, 2014/01/06
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jay Belanger, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Sebastian Wiesner, 2014/01/05
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Kastrup, 2014/01/05
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/04
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git,
grischka <=