Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:25:40 -0800
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > All of the core developers used bzr for years with no
> > problems.
> 
> bzr is significantly and annoyingly slower than git in most of my
> use cases.

In percents, but not in absolute numbers.  It is fast enough.

And if speed is so important to you, why do you use makeinfo 5, which
is 18 times slower than its predecessor?

> I can and have put up with it and have gotten work done, but saying
> it has "no problems" goes too far.

Sorry, but I didn't mean you when I wrote the above.