[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apologia for bzr
From: |
David Engster |
Subject: |
Re: Apologia for bzr |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Jan 2014 11:01:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> I guess I really meant "If they switch to having a common branch history
>> with core Emacs, then merging and change porting gets a lot easier,
>
> As you know, there is no VCS tool out there that can actually handle
> such a thing. Two-way syncs between different branches is still an
> open problem.
The question is whether you would consider adding projects as submodules
to the Emacs repository. I think this would make sense for CEDET; we
already have a branch upstream which mirrors the lisp/cedet directory in
Emacs. This would of course imply that we move our repository from
Sourceforge to Savannah, and sync our user lists so that people can
push.
It'd be premature to discuss details now, of course, but I know that not
everyone is fond of submodules, and I'd just like to know if you're one
of those. :-)
-David
- Re: Apologia for bzr, (continued)
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Josh, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr,
David Engster <=
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/04
- Re: Apologia for bzr, chad, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, David Engster, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Bastien, 2014/01/04
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Tassilo Horn, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Ulrich Mueller, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Tassilo Horn, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03