[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move
|
From: |
James Cloos |
|
Subject: |
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move |
|
Date: |
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:05:04 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "JC" == James Cloos <address@hidden> writes:
JC> Before the gc, .git/objects used about 1 Gig of disk space, per du(1).
And I forgot to add, after the gc --agressive, du(1) reports 209M.
So, if you have at least 1.5M worth of bandwidth, the clone + gc + download
should fit into one hour of VM time.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <address@hidden> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
- bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, James Cloos, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, joakim, 2014/01/03
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/03
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, joakim, 2014/01/03
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Samuel Bronson, 2014/01/03
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/05
- "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history" (was: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move), Joshua Judson Rosen, 2014/01/05
- Re: "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history", Glenn Morris, 2014/01/05
- Re: "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history", Wolfgang Jenkner, 2014/01/05
- Re: "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/06