[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: function arguments
From: |
Rustom Mody |
Subject: |
Re: function arguments |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:48:30 +0530 |
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Michael Heerdegen
<address@hidden> wrote:
> From the doc:
>
> ,----------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Each argument is a list of elements of the form (FROM . TO), where FROM
> | is a character to be translated to TO.
> `----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Your first example is valid (with one such argument given), but not
> your second (because your arguments are not _lists_ of elements of the
> form (FROM . TO)). So, the doc seems to be correct, but you must not
> get confused by the list of lists of blah structure ;-)
Ok now I see it (and the nested dolist's in the code).
A little more redundant docs would of course help the idiots like..
yours truly
Rusi
--
http://www.the-magus.in
http://blog.languager.org