[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: the state of the concurrency branch |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:42:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Theoretically, it's already true on trunk that timers can run with
> different dynamic bindings each time it runs. sit-for is called from
> various places, timers can run within timers, and all can dynamically
> bind variables.
In theory you could imagine a scheme where timers inherit the dynamic
bindings that are in place when the timer is setup (or when the process
is started).
It wouldn't provide the exact same behavior we have currently, butit
might be made close enough to give the right behavior in practice in
most cases.
Stefan
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Barry OReilly, 2013/10/16
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Barry OReilly, 2013/10/16
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/10/17
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/10/17
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/18
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/10/18
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Richard Stallman, 2013/10/19
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Barry OReilly, 2013/10/19
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Barry OReilly, 2013/10/19
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/10/21
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Barry OReilly, 2013/10/21
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/21
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/21
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Barry OReilly, 2013/10/19