[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DSO-style FFI
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: DSO-style FFI |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 22:40:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> This approach seems very weird to me.
Yup.
> I don't understand why it is preferable to a libffi-based FFI.
I don't claim it's a better solution, really. I just don't see anny
movement towards providing libffi support (other than people saying we
should do it).
I think the reason is that I don't know anyone who's willing/able to add
libffi support to Emacs and write the corresponding code to link to
(say) libgnutls.
Whereas the path I suggest only involves steps which I'm pretty sure
many people here can do without much trouble.
Stefan> One issue will be compatibility of various kinds of dl_open
Stefan> mechanisms on various OSes, but you should find lots of help for
Stefan> that here, so the first version can focus on supporting only
Stefan> GNU/Linux.
> GNU already has libltdl.
See, "you should find lots of help for that here".
Stefan
- Re: DSO-style FFI, (continued)
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Davis Herring, 2013/10/08
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/09
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Davis Herring, 2013/10/09
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/09
- Re: DSO-style DSOs (this is NOT an FFI!), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/10
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/08
- Re: DSO-style FFI,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2013/10/12
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/12
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/14
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/18
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/19
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/19
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Andy Moreton, 2013/10/19
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/19
- Re: DSO-style FFI, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/10/08