[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: managing windows in two frames
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: managing windows in two frames |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2013 14:33:32 -0700 (PDT) |
> Make C-x 5 a prefix key which sets display-buffer-overriding-action for
> the duration of the next command.
>
> So C-x 5 C-x C-f will do the same as what you currently get with C-x 5 f
> (of course, we'd also preserve a C-x 5 f binding for backward
> compatibility,
For more than just that, no? `C-x 5 C-x C-f' is not as simple as
`C-x 5 f'. Occam would grumble.
Yes, Occam might be somewhat happy to eliminate the "extra" commands
`*-other-window' and `*-other-frame', and just have `*'. But the devil
is in the details. It's not clear, so far, whether users would find
this simpler or more complicated.
> and we wouldn't need find-file-other-frame any more,
Do you mean only for `C-x 5 f'? Someone will likely want to bind such
a command (or whatever it becomes) to additional keys, no? Sure s?he
could make do with a lambda expression or whatever, if necessary.
But why? (It's not clear to me just what you have in mind.)
> although we'd also have to keep it for backward compatibility).
For more than just that, I expect...
> Of course, other such prefixes could be used, such as C-x 4.
BTW, what do you do with `C-x 4 C-x 5 C-x C-f'? By your description,
I guess that does the same thing as `C-x 4 f'?
> And as Martin mentions, we'd want one that can say "display in current
> window". That should be no harder to define than C-x 4 or C-x 5.
Suppose it were `C-x 6', for kicks. Would `C-x 6 C-x 4 C-x 5 C-x C-f'
then be the same as `C-x C-f'?
Will you at least be keeping `C-x C-f' "for backward compatibility"?
> More generally you could define such a prefix key that lets you specify
> a particular window to use in the next command.
Could we see a spec of some kind (better description), before the
implementation and possible deprecations?
- Re: managing windows in two frames, (continued)
- Re: managing windows in two frames, martin rudalics, 2013/09/03
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stephen Leake, 2013/09/04
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stephen Leake, 2013/09/04
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/04
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stephen Leake, 2013/09/04
- Re: managing windows in two frames, martin rudalics, 2013/09/06
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stephen Leake, 2013/09/07
- Re: managing windows in two frames, martin rudalics, 2013/09/07
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stephen Leake, 2013/09/07
- Re: managing windows in two frames, martin rudalics, 2013/09/08
- RE: managing windows in two frames,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: managing windows in two frames, martin rudalics, 2013/09/06
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/06
- Re: managing windows in two frames, martin rudalics, 2013/09/06
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stephen Leake, 2013/09/07
- Re: managing windows in two frames, martin rudalics, 2013/09/07
- Re: managing windows in two frames, Stephen Leake, 2013/09/07
Re: managing windows in two frames, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/03